(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA045500869; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 16:14:29 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@webcom.com>
Received: from nova.unix.portal.com by webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA045420866; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 16:14:26 -0700
Received: from hobo.online.portal.com (hobo.online.portal.com [156.151.5.5]) by nova.unix.portal.com (8.6.11/8.6.5) with ESMTP id QAA18673 for <lightwave@webcom.com>; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 16:17:37 -0700
From: Jeric@cup.portal.com
Received: (pccop@localhost) by hobo.online.portal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id QAA18519 for lightwave@webcom.com; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 16:17:36 -0700
To: lightwave@webcom.com
Subject: Re: Kim Thomas (rendering backwards)
Lines: 35
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 95 16:17:36 PDT
Message-Id: <9506171617.2.18318@cup.portal.com>
X-Origin: The Portal System (TM)
Sender: owner-lightwave@webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Eric Case writes:
>On Sat, 17 Jun 1995 Jeric@cup.portal.com wrote:
>
>> Now, if you are feeling clever and think you are going to save
>> some render time on a simple oscillating or pulsating effect by
>> rendering one half to the PAR, duplcating the frames backwards,
>> and gluing the two pieces together, you will be sad to know this
>> does not work.
>>
>> I tried it with some glowing arrows, no movement at all, and there
>> is still a little jump where it reverses.
>
>Jeric I had no problems with this in a frame rendered anim, so does this
>mean that the field flip thing does not work?
>-Eric
Just to make sure, I just did it again, and no, for whatever reason
the field flip does not solve this particular problem. Matter of fact